Elevate Your Prosecution: Petitioning Examiner Errors After Final
Originally published on Presentation at Elevate Your Prosecution conference
Julie Burke, Ph.D.
Michael Spector
Blog
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only.
More Stories
USPTO Petition Process: Who Should Pay for the Burden of Inordinate Delays and “Mistakes”?
IPWatchdog
All applicants deserve to have their petitions treated in a consistent manner…. Inconsistency within the USPTO’s petition practice should not be used as a poor excuse for further inconsistency.
Julie Burke, Ph.D.
Michael Spector
USPTO After Final Petition Statistics – Are Things as Bad as They Appear? (Part VI)
IPWatchdog
The USPTO apparently gives each Technology Center the discretion as to when and how they choose to process petitions, and even who has authority to decide such petitions. This results in significant TC-to-TC variation in standards of review, petition pendency, and grant rates, making it difficult for practitioners to know what to expect when filing similar types of petitions in various TCs.
Julie Burke, Ph.D.
Michael Spector
The Good, the Bad and the Missing: Findings from a Review of the Data on Granted Retroactive Foreign Filing Licenses
IPWatchdog
The process to obtain a RFFL, while often lengthy and arduous, is successfully accomplished over 70% of the time…. Yet, it should be concerning that 84% of the granted decisions for a RFFL are not found in Public PAIR’s Image File Wrapper.”
Michael Spector
Julie Burke, Ph.D.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Latest product updates, articles, and case studies, sent to your inbox.
© 2025 Petition.ai LLC. All rights reserved.
Petition.ai LLC is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.